by R. Webster Kehr
Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.
Modern Medical EthicsI need to explain some key concepts about “modern medicine” which could be very relevant to those still on chemotherapy and/or radiation. These concepts are significant and may affect your chance of surviving your cancer. That is a big claim, but you will understand why after you read this article.
First of all, you should remember from the home page that the true 5-year cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3% (actually, about 2.1%). That is from the Journal of Oncology in 2004. Their “cure rate” hasn’t changed much, if any, since 2004. They hide their true cure rate by using clever terminology, such as by using the term “response,” which means nothing as far as survival is concerned.
Also remember that the 5-year cure rate, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, of Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist by training, was 90%. Dr. Kelley’s protocol is public information (it is in one of his books).
What this means is that orthodox medicine could easily have a 90% cure rate, yet orthodox medicine continues to use cancer treatments which yield a 3% cure rate. Why do you think they do that?
Johanna Brandt had a 100% cure rate in the 1930s. She was ignored by orthodox medicine even before chemotherapy was developed after World War II.
But the problem with orthodox medicine is not simply that they choose to use the most profitable treatments. Another key reason for their poor cure rate is that oncologists will treat a cancer patientlong after they know the patient cannot survive their cancer!!
Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.
Modern Medical EthicsI need to explain some key concepts about “modern medicine” which could be very relevant to those still on chemotherapy and/or radiation. These concepts are significant and may affect your chance of surviving your cancer. That is a big claim, but you will understand why after you read this article.
First of all, you should remember from the home page that the true 5-year cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3% (actually, about 2.1%). That is from the Journal of Oncology in 2004. Their “cure rate” hasn’t changed much, if any, since 2004. They hide their true cure rate by using clever terminology, such as by using the term “response,” which means nothing as far as survival is concerned.
Also remember that the 5-year cure rate, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, of Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist by training, was 90%. Dr. Kelley’s protocol is public information (it is in one of his books).
What this means is that orthodox medicine could easily have a 90% cure rate, yet orthodox medicine continues to use cancer treatments which yield a 3% cure rate. Why do you think they do that?
Johanna Brandt had a 100% cure rate in the 1930s. She was ignored by orthodox medicine even before chemotherapy was developed after World War II.
But the problem with orthodox medicine is not simply that they choose to use the most profitable treatments. Another key reason for their poor cure rate is that oncologists will treat a cancer patientlong after they know the patient cannot survive their cancer!!
RSS Feed
