by R. Webster Kehr
Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

(While the author of www.dilipkumargoswami.com does not endorse use of chemotherapy or radiation in treatment of cancer, those who opt for these barbaric treatments can reduce the intensity of side effects as well as increase the effectiveness of these conventional treatments by following this article.—DKG)

For Those on Chemotherapy and/or RadiationYou will not understand this article until you  understand that cancer is caused by microbes which are INSIDE of the cancer cells. If you kill these microbes, the cancer cells will restore their metabolism and will revert into normal cells.

This eliminates the cancer cells without creating any debris from dead cancer cells. It is the ideal way to cure cancer.

This article is NOT a cancer treatment!!! Do not use this article as a cancer treatment. The things in this article only deal with the use of chemotherapy and/or radiation.

Rule #1 – Avoid Electromedicine Protocols

Do not use any of the electromedicine protocols on this website while on chemotherapy or radiation. This includes both of the GB-4000 machines and the Bob Beck devices ( Not yet published in this website—DKG).

Do not use them when using chemotherapy or radiation!!

The reason is that electromedicine protocols create electroporation. Electroporation “opens” the ports of all cells, not just cancer cells. These devices will allow chemotherapy to get inside of many non-cancerous cells. This is not a good thing!!

by R. Webster Kehr
Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

Modern Medical EthicsI need to explain some key concepts about “modern medicine” which could be very relevant to those still on chemotherapy and/or radiation. These concepts are significant and may affect your chance of surviving your cancer. That is a big claim, but you will understand why after you read this article.

First of all, you should remember from the home page that the true 5-year cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3% (actually, about 2.1%). That is from the Journal of Oncology in 2004. Their “cure rate” hasn’t changed much, if any, since 2004. They hide their true cure rate by using clever terminology, such as by using the term “response,” which means nothing as far as survival is concerned.

Also remember that the 5-year cure rate, on newly diagnosed cancer patients, of Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist by training, was 90%. Dr. Kelley’s protocol is public information (it is in one of his books).

What this means is that orthodox medicine could easily have a 90% cure rate, yet orthodox medicine continues to use cancer treatments which yield a 3% cure rate. Why do you think they do that?

Johanna Brandt had a 100% cure rate in the 1930s. She was ignored by orthodox medicine even before chemotherapy was developed after World War II.

But the problem with orthodox medicine is not simply that they choose to use the most profitable treatments. Another key reason for their poor cure rate is that oncologists will treat a cancer patientlong after they know the patient cannot survive their cancer!!